Quick fix is Increasing Your Tech Debt

In partnership with

Cut Through Noise with The Flyover!

The Flyover offers a refreshing alternative to traditional news.

We deliver quick-to-read, informative content across sports, business, tech, science, and more that cuts through the noise of mainstream media.

The Flyover's talented team of editors meticulously collects the day's most important news, ensuring you stay informed on top stories and equipped to win your day.

Join over 950,000 savvy readers and leaders who trust The Flyover to provide unbiased insights, sourced from hundreds of outlets!

Subscribe with One Click!

Hey, I’m Kushagra. What’s poppin’?

Most teams fix problems by adding explanations—tooltips, pop-ups, and guides. But the best design? It makes things so smooth, no one needs an explanation.

Let’s break it down in this issue.

Design seems easy from the outside.

See a problem. Please fix it. Ship it. Done.

But look closer, and you’ll notice a weird pattern.

Take user feedback, for example. When people struggle with a feature, most teams just… explain it.
A tooltip. A pop-up. A tutorial.

Seems smart, right? People are lost, so you help them out.

But every extra tip, every little guide? It adds clutter. Makes the whole thing feel heavier.

Each one is saying, "Yeah, we kinda messed up the design."

And over time, all these band-aid fixes pile up. Not in obvious ways, but in tiny, annoying friction that users feel—but can’t quite name.

The wild part? It works the other way, too.

Instead of explaining the confusion, what if you fixed the root cause?

Made things so smooth, so obvious, that no one even needed an explanation?

This isn’t just about UI—it’s everywhere in product design:

🚀 Quick features → Slow tech debt
🎨 Fast visual fixes → Messy UX later
📈 Growth hacks → Trust issues

The best designs don’t fix problems fast. They stop them from happening in the first place.

Here’s how you fix those root causes right where they start:

🚀 Quick features → Slow tech debt
Before shipping, pause for 30 minutes to ask:

• Is this feature built to survive future changes?

• What’s the smallest reusable piece we can create?

• Are we hard-coding for now or designing for later?

Tech debt isn’t bad—unintentional tech debt is. Build with eyes open.

🎨 Fast visual fixes → Messy UX later
Every “quick fix” should answer:

• Does this follow our design system, or does it create a new rule?

• Does this solve the symptom or the cause?

• Will this choice still make sense in 6 months?

The cleanest UX doesn’t come from polish but from clarity and consistency.

📈 Growth hacks → Trust issues
Every growth experiment needs a gut check:

• Would I feel good if this was done to me?

• Does this build trust or borrow it?

• If this works, how do we make it permanent (without trickery)?

The best growth isn’t about faster conversion. It’s about earning belief.

When you design for fewer explanations, you design for more trust—and trust compounds faster than any hack.

Read by C.E.O.'s & Execs

What do CEOs and West Wing staffers have in common? They all read Puck, the platform for smart and engaging journalism—a trusted source for executives and insiders.

Start Your 14-Day Free Trial

What I found amazing this week

Lenovo’s MWC 2025 concepts redefine the future of laptops—are we ready? 💻

This track gave me a serious boost—check out ‘People change’ by Wildlife Control🎵

AI Interfaces of the Future: A Cutting-Edge Design Review✨